In this post, Understanding Text Complexity – Quantitative Measures, we will continue talking about another measure of text complexity that a teachers should use when selecting texts for classroom use.
The Quantitative factors refer to things about the text that can be counted or “quantified.” These include factors such as word length and frequency, sentence length, and complexity of vocabulary used in the text.
We want students to be reading text that could be called “Goldilocks text” – not too easy but not too hard either. To match students with “just right” text that challenges them but does not overwhelm them, it is important to examine the levels of complexity contained in the text.
What are Quantitative Measures of Text Complexity?
Quantitative measures are generally what publishers rely on to determine the difficulty of a text. Often the “readability” of a text is calculated by computer software and considers factors such as word length, word frequency, sentence length and text cohesion.
There are many formulas such as the Flesch Reading Ease Formula, the Flesch-Kincaid Index, Fry’s Readability Graph, The Dale-Chall Readability Formula, and the Spache Readability Formula, and the Lexile Framework for Reading.
A readability measure can just give us a sense of the difficulty of the text construct. It cannot tell us whether the subject matter is appropriate for the reader. It also cannot tell us whether the reader has the background knowledge required to comprehend the author’s message.
Using Readability Formulas to Assess Text Complexity
Let’s look at how understanding the Lexile level of texts might help us in the classroom. A book with a Lexile level of 1200 would be more of a book used in high school, while a book with a Lexile level of 800 might be more appropriate for a student in grades 4 or 5.
At the lowest grade in each band, students focus on reading texts within that text complexity band. To reach the higher bands, students must “stretch” their skills to read a certain proportion of texts that belong to the next higher text complexity band. This pattern repeats itself as students progress to higher grade levels.
This allows students to build on earlier literacy gains and then challenge themselves by reading texts at higher complexity levels. Lexile measures and ranges help to determine what text is appropriate for each grade band. It also suggests what should be considered “stretch” text.
This does not mean that if a student cannot read texts written in the “stretch” Lexile band, we push students into text that is too difficult for them. Instead, we scaffold and guide our students to help them stretch and grow their reading skills to help them close the gap between their current reading level and where we want them to be.
As students move through the grades, they apply their skills to increasingly complex texts.
Here are the suggested grade level “stretch” bands that we are striving to help our readers reach.
|Text Complexity Grade Band||Previous Lexile Bands||Current “Stretch” Lexile Reading Target Bands|
While a readability level can be helpful for matching readers with appropriate texts, it is only one measure of text complexity. That is where qualitative measures and reader and task measures must also be considered.
When selecting a text, you want it to be able to stretch your students but not overwhelm them. This is the secret to finding a “just right” text.
Learn more about how to match readers to text and deepen comprehension in my book: Literacy Strategies for Grades 4-12: Reinforcing the Threads of Reading.
You May Also Like:
Learn more about matching readers to the tasks we want them to do,
Learn more about the Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity.